Home › Forums › WoodMart support forum › Speed-NO issues. Need prompt Solution for Mobile Results on Homepage -Google PSI
Speed-NO issues. Need prompt Solution for Mobile Results on Homepage -Google PSI
- This topic has 8 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 10 months ago by Artem Temos.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2022 at 3:02 pm #347532
harshweParticipantHello,
Speed Results, looking only for Mobile and just for Home page with same Demo – Decor
(A kind request – Please read this thoroughly till end and suggest)
Expecting favourable response and a proper solution, with as much details you can provide.A). After testing so many times during last 50 days or so (since Theme installation and thereafter every few days), I found that the Speed Results are pretty much decent for us, in terms of our Hosting speed and Server Response times (as well including Theme). And also seems better, if we compare our site with that of Woodmarts own Demo site too(as mentioned in Speed Optimization Guide page – SOG, from below page).
PS: We are using same Demo Decor with almost same content on Home page.SOG Page – https://bit.ly/3fKcdpN
Woodmart’s Demo site URL – https://bit.ly/3qOB4z3
Our site – http://www.vasangini.com (using same Demo – Demo Decor)We tested Home page, both ours and yours demo (as in SOG) side-by-side, with GTMetrix (GTM), webpagetest.org (WPT), and Google Speed Insights (GSI), many a times (few of these results shown below)
We found that Results are comparatively better for our site (as compared to Woodmarts own Demo site as mentioned in SOG), in terms of TTFB, fully loaded time, Performance (as per GTM results), Server Response Time, FCP, Speed Index (as in WPT results), and many other aspects. (results shown below)
Even with GSI, the Desktop results are also 98-99 for our site.The only difference, we come across, is for Mobile results on Home page (as per Google Speed Insights – GSI). And this is what we are only concern about. And wanted to know further.
Important to Note: We are NOT using Newsletter Pop Up on for Mobiles. And NO Top bar too for Mobiles. Also, NO promo bar enabled too. And we have CDN enabled.
However, In your same demo, CDN is NOT enabled, and your demo is using Newsletter Pop Up too.Workflow, Process, Testing – (below point refers same point numbers as in your own SOG page)
We tried every possibility and gone through each option as suggested in your SOG page too, as below-
1. Checked Server response time (most of the time, ours is better and tested many a times)
Brotli enabled too (Advance compression)2. Theme Settings > Done, and as suggested. Light bootstrap enabled, Disabled Gutenburg styles, Not using any Google fonts, Lazy loading (from LS Cache plugin), Init Carousel Enabled, WPBakery – Disabled unnecessary options, AJAX dropdown ON for menus
3. Images > Home page, as-it-is as imported from the Demo named – Demo Decor. Including Sliders too. Infact, almost whole data on site, as it is, like Demo Decor
NOT using Rev Slider, and is removed.4. Using LS Cache plugin (which we found much better than even WP Rocket – this is just our view. And as can be seen, as, it is giving better results for Desktop too) on Lite Speed Servers. Hence much compatible and supporting. Including Brotli compression
and comparatively Powerful configuration on Cloud Shared hosting (as compared to yours on Cloudways), with below config-
40 GB SSD Storage
6 Cores CPU
6 GB RAM
All recommended settings Enabled, with Deferred JS5. CDN – Although it is NOT enabled in your own same Demo, but we have it Enabled in ours (and can be seen from below reports).
PS: We are Not using any 3rd Party plugin so far (since Woodmart installation) and just the default ones, atleast as of now.
NO additional products (just 8-10, or so, for working and testing purposes)
NO additional pages, except a one or two.
NO additional postsAfter following each and every recommendation-
We found that Server Response time in Waterfall (as per Webpagetest), in Your demo site (as in SOG) is almost double or more, in comparison to ours. And All other results of our site seems pretty decent and better, in comparison too. So regarding Hosting and Servers, our site is hosted with, this comes out as satisfactory. And so their overall performance too.
The same can be seen and verified from the below results tooWPT.org results–
Woodmart Demo- Decor (as in SOG)-
https://bit.ly/3qQP7V4
https://bit.ly/3KqDTyhVasangini (ours)
https://bit.ly/3FP1tRC
https://bit.ly/3rDfYmHGTMetrix Results
Woodmart (SOG)
https://bit.ly/3GScK58
https://bit.ly/33QDILLVasangini
https://bit.ly/33QE0SR
https://bit.ly/3Aj9Un2Now Important one (Regarding Google Page speed warnings)-
We are Not using Font Awesome icons in Menus, as suggested
Not using Google fonts at all. Using Custom fonts
Disabled Gutenberg styles
Using Woodmart Slider (as in same Demo). Rev Slider deleted. Even this below option was set prior to Deleting too-
Slider Revolution -> Globals -> Include libraries globally -> OFF.Point and Query is –
i). Why we are still getting the jquery related result in Eliminate Render blocking resources. When we have completely removed Rev Slider. Below is what showing –
https://www.vasangini.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.6.0
What this file is for. As suggested in SOG page, this can be eliminated by disabling Rev Slider. But this is still showing up (in Google PSI results), when we have already Deleted or removed that.
How to get this removed further.ii. If every result of our site is comparatively better with these 3 of the major Testing sites, then why ONLY for mobile (as per Google PSI), the result is not as good as it is for your same Demo Decor site (as mentioned in SOG)
I found that, for this specific demo (as mentioned in SOG), a Separate Home page is prepared and added for Mobiles, by your team. Please correct me If I am wrong.
Other than that, I think there are few other settings and changes have been made, by team, just for Mobile devices. Am I correct. Is that so.I wanted to know about those settings and changes specifically. So that we can try by implementing those too. If there is anything else also, then please let me know.
PS: We had already enabled DOM optimization for Mobile in Theme settings > Performance
Overall, how can we improve the results (of Home page) just for Mobiles to be shown through Google Page Speed Insight testing. Please help on this.
What else is required, and what is missing from our side, in order to bring the results equal or atleast similar to what is showing for your Demo site (as in SOG).
Yours is showing 90-98 for Mobiles, while Ours shows 62-86 for MobilesWe only want similar results once on Home page, thereafter we can make further changes according to needs, and will not by worrying about Speed related results. As that would have already been seen and checked by using the same Demo for our site.
We need to get assured just once, regarding speed results for Mobiles through Google PSIMost Important:
With that said and above request, we do NOT mean to say or inform, that Woodmart Theme is slow. By no means, we want to convey this. So far, speed from the Woodmart Theme seems pretty decent and much reasonable, atleast for us.
Also, we are Not comparing with any other site or Theme. Nor we want to.We are just looking at the results of Woodmart’s own Demo site (Demo Decor, as in SOG link) through Google PSI, and wants to get the desire and similar results with that same Demo, that we are using on our Domain. And that too only concern about results for Mobile devices on Home page.
Please suggest
Regards
- This topic was modified 2 years, 12 months ago by harshwe.
January 24, 2022 at 3:16 pm #347536
Artem TemosKeymasterHello,
Thank you for contacting us and writing your request with so many details.
As you mentioned, you didn’t use WP Rocket. And that is the main difference. When we test your page with GSI we always get ~80-82 which is quite good.
If you want, please, install WP Rocket instead of your current cache plugin and walk through all the steps from the article. If you still have a low score, please, send us your admin access and we will check everything by ourselves.Kind Regards
January 25, 2022 at 2:12 pm #347833
harshweParticipantHello Artem,
1. First of all, WP Rocket is not the only plugin out there in the market. And it is NOT the number one or Top most in the Universe. And there is NO such proof either.
Also, I think with this response of yours, it seems, you have completely IGNORED my previous message. And have NOT even gone through the details at all.
2. Secondly, by NO means, you people can or should force to use the PAID plugin, that is WP Rocket.
3. I already informed that our hosting is on LS Servers and LS Cache plugins works best and is compatible with the same too.
4. It seems, few people at support are Not aware of LS Cache plugin and its settings. Hence, might be distracting ,we users. Or have a misconception, that ONLY WP Rocket is everything or Unbeatable or GOD-Like.
5. Also, if at all, the results would have Not been better for desktop too, one may have considered using WP Rocket. But as I clearly mentioned (with every bit of possible detail), and as can be seen too, that if the results are comparatively better for our site (as compared to yours), for desktop, and in almost every aspect, then this itself Proves that LS Cache plugin is doing its job, and much better than WP Rocket too.
And so our Hosting service and its speed too. This cannot be denied.5.a. Take this other way, if LS cache plugin would Not have doing its job, then it would not have shown better results for Desktop too and comparatively better results too (when compared with yours).
6. With your message, it seems, that you trying to ONLY pinpoint or find out what we or any of your customer is missing or Do NOT have, even if there is single tiny thing. And trying to make that single thing the ONLY Culprit, or the root-cause.
Because, NOW you could not find anything wrong with our site and our comparison factor, you want to blame some other way. Is that so.What about ALL remaining differences that can be clearly seen from above screenshots and details (that I have posted).
Can’t this be seen.7. I have shared credentials with you already. Would have appreciated, if you could have checked things at backend. Settings of LS Cache plugin and other things too.
8. Instead of writing this way, should not you actually try to look into each point and try to resolve this thing.
Why simply ignoring
9. You did not even care to look into and answer these below queries too, that I asked earlier-
Point and Query is –
i). Why we are still getting the jquery related result in Eliminate Render blocking resources. When we have completely removed Rev Slider. Below is what showing –
https://www.vasangini.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.6.0
What this file is for. As suggested in SOG page, this can be eliminated by disabling Rev Slider. But this is still showing up (in Google PSI results), when we have already Deleted or removed that.
How to get this removed further.ii). If every result of our site is comparatively better with these 3 of the major Testing sites, then why ONLY for mobile (as per Google PSI), the result is not as good as it is for your same Demo Decor site (as mentioned in SOG)
I found that, for this specific demo (as mentioned in SOG), a Separate Home page is prepared and added for Mobiles, by your team. Please correct me If I am wrong.
Other than that, I think there are few other settings and changes have been made, by team, just for Mobile devices. Am I correct. Is that so.I wanted to know about those settings and changes specifically. So that we can try by implementing those too. If there is anything else also, then please let me know.
10. I already wrote, that I am NOT blaming Woodmart theme at all, regarding speed and similar comparison (atleast for Desktop by using same Demo – Decor).
With that said and above request, we do NOT mean to say or inform, that Woodmart Theme is slow. By no means, we want to convey this. So far, speed from the Woodmart Theme seems pretty decent and much reasonable, atleast for us.
We are ONLY looking for solution and better results for Mobiles, nothing else.
Regards
January 26, 2022 at 1:52 pm #348087
Artem TemosKeymasterHello,
Your question was very simple and we answered it. But anyway, I will respond point by point to assure you that I didn’t ignore any detail.
1. Yes, we agree and you can use any plugin you like. But your question was why we have such results on our example. And I answered that it is because of WP Rocket. This is proven in the article also.
2. Of course, we don’t force you to use it. You can find any alternative you like. But we can’t guarantee that all plugins will have the same functionality and will give you the same result.
3. OK, we take this into account also.
4. You are right, we didn’t test this plugin very deeply. But we are not responsible for its functionality.
5. Desktop performance is almost the same 90+. And Google measures Desktop and Mobile performance differently so this detail doesn’t make any sense.
It doesn’t prove that this plugin is better. But we don’t say that it is worse too. As we said, this factor doesn’t mean anything for mobile performance.6. We would be happy to find the difference and tell you, but, as I said, I didn’t work with this plugin very closely. Maybe you would better contact plugin developers for help on this matter.
7. Again, I can’t guarantee that you will get 90+ points on mobile with this particular plugin. And any theme author can’t. We can’t take the responsibility for all cache plugins available for WordPress. We described the way we optimized our website with WP Rocket as just an example. Maybe, we will do the same article for LS cache one day.
8. I’m actually answering your points one by one.
9i. The same answer here. With WP Rocket, jQuery library was deferred correctly and not marked by Google. And with your plugin, it is not. So the conclusion is that the plugin works differently.
9ii. No, it is not correct. We didn’t make anything special there. There are no tricks and everything is described in the article step by step.
10. Yes, we understand your point. You want to understand why it doesn’t look as per demo. And we would be happy to help. Try to resolve the problem with jQuery library first. Also, the delay JS execution option is very useful in WP rocket. We are not sure if your plugin has a similar option and that can be the difference.
Please, feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Kind Regards
January 27, 2022 at 4:11 pm #348434
harshweParticipantHello Artem,
Thank you for your inline response.
1. First of all, it is clearly mentioned in the SOG article, that one can use any other plugin, and so we did. As can be seen here-
https://i2.paste.pics/FSMHN.png1.b.The LS Cache is NOT using Older technologies, at all. This comes pre-bundled with one of the latest Server technology too and is compatible too.
1.c. The LS Cache plugin has got almost all such settings, as suggested in SOG article. Even may have got more, as compared to others.
2.
Desktop performance is almost the same 90+. And Google measures Desktop and Mobile performance differently so this detail doesn’t make any sense…
Not only this, for All other areas, it is showing better results from other Testing sites too, for the Desktop. We are Not focussing ONLY on 90+
3.
It doesn’t prove that this plugin is better..
So, that means, even that doesn’t prove that WP Rocket is better, if it is showing better just for Mobiles. Hence proved too.
Also, LS Cache plugin may not be better, but on the other hand, cannot be worse too. Shall not be under estimated.4. Above all, we have mentioned very clearly, that if -LS cache plugin would Not have been doing its job or not performing well, then it would not have shown better results for Desktop too and comparatively better results too (when compared with yours).
Including Server Response Time, everything below seems much better and showing comparatively better results for us on those Major testing sites, like -in terms of TTFB, fully loaded time, Performance (as per GTM results), Server Response Time, FCP, Speed Index (as in WPT results), and many other aspects.The only thing is for Mobile results through Google PSI test.
That really needs some attention.5. So point is, WP Rocket alone, could not make such a huge difference.
Specially, considering below points on Same Decor demo, and for Home page –
a. When we are NOT using Promo Pop Up for mobile, whereby your demo is using
b. NOT using Top bar for mobile, whereby your demo is using
c. Not using Rev Slider. NOT using Google Fonts at all
d. Also, when our Server Stats are higher than what is used for your Demo and hence giving better results too.
e. And few others..
Even Server Response time is almost Half for our site (as compared to yours), as can be seen from previous screenshots too.6. So if there are so many Positive and additional points on and for our site, they WHY to Stuck just with ONE difference of WP Rocket, that too when we are still using one of the better one.
9.i).
With WP Rocket, jQuery library was deferred correctly and not marked by Google. And with your plugin, it is not…
In SOG it is mentioned, that to disable this warning, one should remove Rev Slider plugin, or disable that setting from Global options. And for your info, we have already Deleted the Rev Slider. So, how come that is still showing up. Logically, it should NOT be there at all, when it is Only coming out from Rev slider (if not used any other plugin too).And we are NOT using any 3rd party plugin so far, too.
9. ii) What I come across, It seems correct. Please check below Screenshot, this section has been completely removed from mobile view.
https://i2.paste.pics/FS666.png
Have you seen that..If this has already been removed (and still you did not accepted), then there could still be the possibility that something else or few other changes might have been made. That is changes for mobiles, in order to improve the results. That is why I asked earlier also.
10. If at all we have been using WP Rocket, then you may have been trying to find some other difference. Finding out JUST the difference in-between two is NOT always logical. One should find, when that makes Really a difference. Not to forgot, the points in 5th above too.
There are many other users (customers of Woodmart), using WP Rocket, but are not getting results even close to ours. Not even above 80 or so. And then you are suggesting them some thing else, and trying to pin point or find out their weakness (even if it is not).That also means that WP Rocket alone cannot do the justice. And is NOT the only one out in the market.
11. I only wanted to know, Overall, how we can improve the results (for Home page) just for Mobiles to be shown through Google Page Speed Insight testing. Please help on this.
What else is required, and what is missing from our side, in order to bring the results equal or atleast similar to what is showing for your Demo site (as in SOG).Yours is showing 96-98 for Mobiles, while Ours shows 62-86 for Mobiles.
We only want similar results once on and for Home page, thereafter we can make further changes according to needs, and will not by worrying about Speed related results. As that would have already been seen and checked by using the same Demo for our site.
We need to get assured just once, regarding speed results for Mobiles through Google PSI12. Please be noted, that I am NOT blaming Woodmart theme at all, regarding speed and similar comparison (atleast for Desktop by using same Demo – Decor).With that said and above request, we do NOT mean to say or inform, that Woodmart Theme is slow. By no means, we want to convey this.
13. As requested in point 7 earlier (credentials already shared), I would like to request you to please check with below-
a. Overall Theme settings, that we have made on site.
b. the LS Cache plugin
c. Its settings (regarding deferred, delayed). Its CSS settingsYou can make changes and test accordingly, in order to get desire results. And to improve the overall performance specially for mobiles.
We have taken backup of LS Cache plugin settings. Even you take the backup first, before making changes. And can also, Export settings, once done. (Export option is there in the Toolbox settings of LS Cache plugin)
You can do research and a thorough testing no our site for LS Cache plugin settings to work accordingly.PS: Plugin support team already suggested us most of the settings earlier. But as every Theme works differently and have their own code (and so Woodmart has got, with their own inbuilt caching part), their support are not aware of that.
However, the Theme developers have got idea about their code and working and proper idea with making settings on Cache plugins too. Your team can better suggest about required settings with Cache plugins accordingly. Just like you have got perfect idea about each setting with WP Rocket (even though this plugin is not yours and not developed by your team), similarly, you or team can suggest with the LS Cache plugin and its settings too.Regards
January 31, 2022 at 10:35 am #349095
Artem TemosKeymasterHello,
1. Of course, you can use any plugin. But we are not able to guarantee that all plugins work in the same way.
3. We don’t say that some plugin is better or worse. We just say that that might work differently. And again, we didn’t work with this particular plugin before. We can’t help you with its configuration.
6. Because this difference might be the main factor for Google. Anyway, we can’t know exactly while we don’t test WP Rocket. Or you can contact your plugin developers and ask why this Google warning is not solved by the plugin. Maybe you just forgot to enable something.
9. Yes, we hide it with CSS but it doesn’t affect the performance. You can hide it also on your website and check how it works.
10. Currently, we don’t see other differences. We recommend you solve the jQuery problems first and then we will move forward.
Kind Regards
January 31, 2022 at 10:39 am #349096
Artem TemosKeymasterBy the way, I just tested it one more time and see that jQuery is no longer a problem and your Google score is about ~85.
It is just a bit different but in general, is very good. We don’t know what else you should improve to get an even better result. https://gyazo.com/056562c2fbcac7921ab44fae9964439cMarch 19, 2022 at 2:24 pm #362307
harshweParticipantHello Artem,
Just thought to update you, that as per your suggestion, I tried (few days back) by enabling the “Deferred JS option” in LS Cache plugin and found that it was then, Not marked by Google and seems correctly deferred too.
I then checked the results and those were much better than earlier too. Even for Mobile those reached pretty reasonable. However, there were few things that were Not working as Intended (during enabling of Deferred JS earlier).
Like, may by Couple of scripts, Opening of Main Menu on Hover, Loading of Product Images not working. (Probably I may had to ADD few JS in the Excludes section too). And even after that, if that had not been working, you and team could have helped me to resolve those things too.
But never mind, as I do Not wanted to follow that way, in actual. I was actually Just looking for and expecting the proper results.
As our site is hosted on Servers who have got very Good overall stats. And had got almost only the Demo content, with NO 3rd party plugins (at that time) and we did Not have any junk and useless data too.And, as I wrote earlier, that I ONLY wanted to see the better Numbers (as per your Optimization guide) on Google PageSpeed Score, and so I did get those, at once.
As, in practical, speed from the Woodmart Theme is pretty decent and much reasonable, atleast for us.
We were ONLY looking for solution and better results for Mobiles, at that time and nothing else.Please to inform you that, my intention was never to blame, but I do believe in appreciating the Good work also. And hence, I thought to wrote this, again
We are happy and relaxed.
Thank you Artem 🙂Keep up the Good Work
Regards
March 21, 2022 at 2:01 pm #362722
Artem TemosKeymasterHello,
Thank you for your feedback. We are glad that you sorted this out and feel happy with our theme performance. Anyway, if you notice any problems, feel free to contact us and we will do our best to make our theme even better in terms of performance.
Have a nice day!
-
AuthorPosts
Tagged: Google Page speed for Mobile, how to improve speed on mobiles, improve results for mobiles, mobile optimization, Mobile results not good, not happy with mobile results, speed for mobile
The topic ‘Speed-NO issues. Need prompt Solution for Mobile Results on Homepage -Google PSI’ is closed to new replies.
- You must be logged in to create new topics. Login / Register